18 May
2018
18 May
'18
10:31 a.m.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:07:11AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
On 18-05-17 18:08, Mark Brown wrote:
Please submit a followup patch which makes the entire comment a C++ one rather than mixing them in the same comment block, it makes things look more intentional.
I'm a bit confused. As documented by the Documentation/process/license-rules.rst the license header should be a C++ comment but for all block comments the 'normal' coding style should be applied. I can seperate the license header and the comment to make it more intentional.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
- Analog Devices SSM2305 Amplifier Driver
- Copyright (C) 2018 Pengutronix, Marco Felsch kernel@pengutronix.de
*/
Is that better?
No, that still looks like a mess. Just make the whole thing a C++ comment.