On Feb 11 2015 22:04, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:49:29 +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 02/11/2015 11:37 AM, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: [...]
-/**
- snd_ctl_new - create a control instance from the template
- @control: the control template
- @access: the default control access
- Allocates a new struct snd_kcontrol instance and copies the given template
- to the new instance. It does not copy volatile data (access).
- Return: The pointer of the new instance, or %NULL on failure.
- */
-static struct snd_kcontrol *snd_ctl_new(struct snd_kcontrol *control,
unsigned int access)+static struct snd_kcontrol *ctl_new(struct snd_kcontrol *control,
I'd prefer to keep both the documentation as well as the 'snd_' prefix. Maybe just replace the '/**' with '/*' to prevent it from appearing in the public API documentation.
Yes, agreed. There is no strict rule about snd_ prefix for non-exported objects. We prefer not having snd_ prefix for local stuff in general just for readability. But in this case, it doesn't improve so much.
Hm. I don't disagree with remaining these comments.
...But I have another issue. In my final patch in another series, I change this function drastically. Then, should I spend a bit time to revise them even if this is just a local function? http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2015-February/087796.ht...
Thanks
Takashi Sakamoto