On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 11:35 +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Liam Girdwood wrote:
Next step may be to support the 'amixer' like syntax for the control and mixer element handling.
Btw, we need to try and avoid using the control ID in any mixer syntax. I found that minor driver changes could change ID numbering meaning major updates to config files. The mixer names are pretty constant and using them has been quite painless.
Definitely. I meant the full control identifier (not just numid).
btw, have started any of the other API changes in use-case.c yet ?
I could make changes to the parser .....
I am working on it slowly. I think that it would be fair to come with a functional code from my side. I will appreciate review and testing, of course. Please, give me few days.
Jaroslav
----- Jaroslav Kysela perex@perex.cz Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc.