![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a7c9a4773543c649adc71c95805d2cbf.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
9 Dec
2013
9 Dec
'13
9:44 p.m.
On 12/09/2013 09:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: [...]
-static int ep93xx_soc_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +int ep93xx_pcm_platform_register(struct device *dev) {
- return snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(&pdev->dev,
- return snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(dev,
This will have a conflict with the "ASoC: ep93xx: Use devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register()" patch from the topic/ep93xx branch. Otherwise the patch looks fine to me.
&ep93xx_dmaengine_pcm_config, SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_NO_RESIDUE | SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_NO_DT | SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_COMPAT);
} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ep93xx_pcm_platform_register);