Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: rsnd: don't use discriminatory terms for function names

On 13/07/2020 14.08, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

-u32 rsnd_ssi_multi_slaves_runtime(struct rsnd_dai_stream *io); +u32 rsnd_ssi_multi_followers_runtime(struct rsnd_dai_stream *io);

I don't have full context here, but AIUI this is about bundling different links together? If so, primary/secondary or main/secondary might work better than leader/follower, in my opinion. The latter implies more of a "one device follows another one" scenario, like for clocks.

Just my 2c. Ditching the horribly ambiguous master/slave terminology is a good chance to pick the replacement that best describes the situation :-)