24 Oct
2019
24 Oct
'19
1:34 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 07:53:31PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
With the revert, we are back to the bit ops. Even if it works, Mark's original comment on the bit ops still stands I think. This is why I'm proposing patch 2 but I don't really mind if it is applied or not.
Yeah, it's not *required* but the atomic operations have lots of spiky edges so a simpler locking construct would have less chance of running into trouble later when someone's updating the code.