31 Jul
2018
31 Jul
'18
10:03 a.m.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:30:16AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
OTOH, if the CPU dai can really provide a dynamic value that is strictly tied with pointer, CPU dai itself should provide the pointer callback that covers both the pointer and the base delay, and it should be used instead of component pointer callback.
Probably anything in the SoC would be potentially able to get a dynamic value out - the main issue for off SoC devices is the cost of getting to the data but that's not an issue when you're memory mapped.