20 Mar
2020
20 Mar
'20
10:52 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0),
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0),
Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15?
Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 is not really any better
Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... Or is it for any family?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko