13 Jun
2008
13 Jun
'08
3:04 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 07:17:42AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
On 6/12/08, Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com wrote:
Instead the codec should make a module parameter for the clock rate.
Ugh. I'm not really crazy about parameters.
Yes, that doesn't seem too clever.
Besides, the codec drivers need to treat all the clocking configuration as dynamic - for example, it's a fairly common pattern for systems that derive the audio clocks from a PLL or similar source to reconfigure the master clock rate depending on the sample rates currently in use, disabling it when not required.