On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 6:37 AM Leon Romanovsky leon@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:09:55PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] Add ancillary bus support
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 12:21 PM Leon Romanovsky leon@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:41:00PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] Add ancillary bus support
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:09:09PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > From: Leon Romanovsky leon@kernel.org > > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 10:33 PM > > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 10:18:07AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > Thanks for the review Leon. > > > > > > > > Add support for the Ancillary Bus, ancillary_device and
ancillary_driver.
> > > > > It enables drivers to create an ancillary_device and > > > > > bind an ancillary_driver to it. > > > > > > > > I was under impression that this name is going to be changed. > > > > > > It's part of the opens stated in the cover letter. > > > > ok, so what are the variants? > > system bus (sysbus), sbsystem bus (subbus), crossbus ? > Since the intended use of this bus is to > (a) create sub devices that represent 'functional separation' > and > (b) second use case for subfunctions from a pci device, > > I proposed below names in v1 of this patchset.
> (a) subdev_bus
It sounds good, just can we avoid "_" in the name and call it subdev?
What is wrong with naming the bus 'ancillary bus'? I feel it's a fitting name. An ancillary software bus for ancillary devices carved off a parent device
registered on a primary bus.
Greg summarized it very well, every internal conversation about this patch with my colleagues (non-english speakers) starts with the question: "What does ancillary mean?" https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20201001071403.GC31191@kroah.com/
"For non-native english speakers this is going to be rough, given that I as a native english speaker had to go look up the word in a dictionary to fully understand what you are trying to do with that name."
I suggested "auxiliary" in another splintered thread on this question. In terms of what the kernel is already using:
$ git grep auxiliary | wc -l 507 $ git grep ancillary | wc -l 153
Empirically, "auxiliary" is more common and closely matches the intended function of these devices relative to their parent device.
auxiliary bus is a befitting name as well.
Let's share all options and decide later. I don't want to find us bikeshedding about it.
Too late we are deep into bikeshedding at this point... it continued over here [1] for a bit, but let's try to bring the discussion back to this thread.
[1]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/10048d4d-038c-c2b7-2ed7-fd4ca87d104a@linux.intel.co...