21 Sep
2017
21 Sep
'17
5:18 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:50:03AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
devm_kasprintf() can fail here and we must check its return value.
This is patch 2/3 but you've only sent me this one patch. This is missing the point of numbering a series, the only reason for the numbering is to provide ordering within the series. If you send a patch separately or as part of a different series then the numbering should change to reflect how things are being sent.