16 Jun
2008
16 Jun
'08
3:45 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:36:19AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
OOI, I guess that if there were some visible control on the board (eg, a few controls via GPIO) then this would be less of an issue since there would be real hardware for the machine/fabric driver to control?
Probably not, because the GPIO node in the device tree would be owned by the GPIO driver. I don't think there's a way to have the fabric driver probed from the device tree. It could be probed manually from the arch/powerpc platform driver.
But wouldn't it now be legal to represent the machine driver as a device in its own right, even if it is connected via GPIOs?