Hi Pierre
We upload v7 patch to follow the coding style as other components. Thanks
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:02 AM Pierre-Louis Bossart < pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 5/17/22 20:31, Terry Chen wrote:
To be able to do driver data for adl_mx98360a_cs4242 which supports two max98360a speaker amplifiers on SSP1 and cs42l42 headphone codec on SSP0 running on ADL platform. Also add the capability to machine
driver
of creating DAI Link for BT offload. Although BT offload always uses SSP2 port but we reserve the flexibility to assign the port number in macro.
Signed-off-by: Terry Chen terry_chen@wistron.corp-partner.google.com (am from https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12845884/) (also found at
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511075522.1764114-1-terry_chen@wistron.corp-p... )
not sure what this is about, what's the point of adding information on the v5 in the v6 patch?
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_cs42l42.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++- .../intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-adl-match.c | 7 ++ 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_cs42l42.c
b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_cs42l42.c
index ce78c18798876..2efffc7933479 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_cs42l42.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_cs42l42.c @@ -41,8 +41,13 @@ #define SOF_CS42L42_DAILINK_MASK (GENMASK(24, 10)) #define SOF_CS42L42_DAILINK(link1, link2, link3, link4, link5) \ ((((link1) | ((link2) << 3) | ((link3) << 6) | ((link4) << 9) |
((link5) << 12)) << SOF_CS42L42_DAILINK_SHIFT) & SOF_CS42L42_DAILINK_MASK)
-#define SOF_MAX98357A_SPEAKER_AMP_PRESENT BIT(25) -#define SOF_MAX98360A_SPEAKER_AMP_PRESENT BIT(26) +#define SOF_BT_OFFLOAD_PRESENT BIT(25) +#define SOF_CS42L42_SSP_BT_SHIFT 26 +#define SOF_CS42L42_SSP_BT_MASK (GENMASK(28, 26)) +#define SOF_CS42L42_SSP_BT(quirk) \
(((quirk) << SOF_CS42L42_SSP_BT_SHIFT) & SOF_CS42L42_SSP_BT_MASK)+#define SOF_MAX98357A_SPEAKER_AMP_PRESENT BIT(29) +#define SOF_MAX98360A_SPEAKER_AMP_PRESENT BIT(30)
enum { LINK_NONE = 0, @@ -50,6 +55,7 @@ enum { LINK_SPK = 2, LINK_DMIC = 3, LINK_HDMI = 4,
LINK_BT = 5,};
/* Default: SSP2 */ @@ -278,6 +284,13 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link_component
dmic_component[] = {
}};
+static struct snd_soc_dai_link_component dummy_component[] = {
{.name = "snd-soc-dummy",.dai_name = "snd-soc-dummy-dai",}+};
static int create_spk_amp_dai_links(struct device *dev, struct snd_soc_dai_link *links, struct snd_soc_dai_link_component
*cpus,
@@ -467,9 +480,56 @@ static int create_hdmi_dai_links(struct device *dev, return -ENOMEM; }
+static int create_bt_offload_dai_links(struct device *dev,
struct snd_soc_dai_link *links,struct snd_soc_dai_link_component*cpus,
int *id, int ssp_bt)+{
int ret = 0;either you remove this useless init...
/* bt offload */if (!(sof_cs42l42_quirk & SOF_BT_OFFLOAD_PRESENT))return 0;links[*id].name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "SSP%d-BT",ssp_bt);if (!links[*id].name) {ret = -ENOMEM;goto devm_err;}links[*id].id = *id;links[*id].codecs = dummy_component;links[*id].num_codecs = ARRAY_SIZE(dummy_component);links[*id].platforms = platform_component;links[*id].num_platforms = ARRAY_SIZE(platform_component);links[*id].dpcm_playback = 1;links[*id].dpcm_capture = 1;links[*id].no_pcm = 1;links[*id].cpus = &cpus[*id];links[*id].num_cpus = 1;links[*id].cpus->dai_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL,"SSP%d Pin",ssp_bt);if (!links[*id].cpus->dai_name) {ret = -ENOMEM;goto devm_err;}(*id)++;return 0;... or you remove the return 0;
pick one.
+devm_err:
return ret;+}
},
{.id = "10134242",.drv_name = "adl_mx98360a_cs4242",.machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,.quirk_data = &adl_max98360a_amp,.sof_tplg_filename = "sof-adl-max98360a-rt5682.tplg",No, I've told this before in previous reviews: do not use a topology name that was designed for a different platform, this is not maintainable. If the topologies happen to be the same, either generate them twice or use a symlink.