On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 01:28:10 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
rtd has own ID, but it is naming "num" for it. The naming is confusable. This patch rename it to "id". And many functions request both "rtd" and its "id" as function parameter, but rtd itself has rtd->id. This patch cleanup it.
And, Qcom driver want to use irregular rtd ID because of its topology, and thus, soc-core need irregular calculation. I'm not sure why only Qcom needs such calculation, but this patch also cleanup it. But I guess we want to cleanup is not soc-core but Qcom side (?)
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/8] ASoC: rename rtd->num to rtd->id commit: 40e47e2db6864aa053a62477bd71a16be9dd4066 [2/8] ASoC: fsl: switch to use rtd->id from rtd->num commit: eae33f737c7a929d92b559fe1a1002d597b7b903 [3/8] ASoC: meson: switch to use rtd->id from rtd->num commit: b19f75df8fa9f8d4aa8b5886dca0f2d832a76baa [4/8] ASoC: sh: switch to use rtd->id from rtd->num commit: 970a874b76d09d6a5880e8832e572850cfcb4008 [5/8] ASoC: generic: switch to use rtd->id from rtd->num commit: 742e622db67efc32affb5893fdcc0149f374533e [6/8] ASoC: remove rtd->num commit: c59db5ed233a19f6aadd086fb89149ec5f6fa855 [7/8] ASoC: soc-core: do rtd->id trick at snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime() commit: cb18cd26039f5cdecb0ac53fb447b6f0859f3d1c [8/8] ASoC: cleanup function parameter for rtd and its id commit: 8b12da9a18f4dd53e4b3a7393829a555e84f073c
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark