15 Dec
2013
15 Dec
'13
2:51 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:43:47AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:06:59PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote:
From: nhcao nhcao@marvell.com
DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime basedon mixer setting updates. DAPM has provided common get/put function for mixer/mux. But these function doesn't call soc_dpcm_runtime_update() func to update pcm links. This patch defines a DPCM DPCM kcontrol. For this control, the common get/put function will update FE to BE links dynamically. This patch has no impact to the current code.
Why shouldn't we just add the DPCM update to the standard controls - what's the benefit in defining a new set of controls?
Precisely my thoughts too, I think that would be a better approach!
-- ~Vinod