On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:20:25AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 15/01/2018 at 08:53:51 +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote:
Probe should fail with -ENODEV when called with NULL pdev->dev.of_node.
Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl ladis@linux-mips.org
sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c b/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c index e6c303ab869d..9db08826b32a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c @@ -84,10 +84,8 @@ static int sam9x5_wm8731_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct sam9x5_drvdata *priv; int ret;
- if (!np) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No device node supplied\n");return -EINVAL;- }
- if (!np)
return -ENODEV;This will never happen, you may as well just remove the test.
Ah, right, this is DT only driver. And the same for the patch 5.
Btw, all that drivers seems to be for development boards, so what about moving to simple card instead? (and let these special drivers die silently)
card = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*card), GFP_KERNEL); priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.15.1
-- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com