12 Jun
2015
12 Jun
'15
2:32 p.m.
On 12 June 2015 at 17:59, Arun Raghavan arun@accosted.net wrote:
Hi folks, I'd like to bring this one up again, since we are currently in the sub-optimal position of forcing ~100 ms latency on USB devices. The original thread is here -- http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2013-December/069666.ht...
While we sort this out, though, is there an upper bound on the USB transfer size (that we could then use a rewind safety margin)? We might be able to use this as a workaround till this can be fixed properly.
-- Arun