9 Aug
2011
9 Aug
'11
5:28 p.m.
On 09/08/11 16:05, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:02PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On 03/08/11 10:11, Mark Brown wrote:
As we had no id_table only the driver name would be matched against meaning that WM8987 devices wouldn't be bound.
Subject line is for wrong codec but otherwise (with new subject line)
Hrm? Subject line says WM8987...
But the diff said WM8750 iirc.
Liam