29 Dec
2010
29 Dec
'10
12:43 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:38:03PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
Furthermore the generic cache uses zero-based numbering while the wm8753 cache uses one-based numbering.
This is why the driver never got updated to use the generic code, FWIW - the cleverness made it more effort to convert.