__fls has the same semantics as ld2, so there is no need to re-implement it. Furthermore a lot of architectures have custom implementations of __fls that are able to use special hardware instructions to compute the result. This makes the code slightly shorter and faster.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de --- include/sound/pcm_params.h | 27 +-------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/sound/pcm_params.h b/include/sound/pcm_params.h index c99e20b..3c45f39 100644 --- a/include/sound/pcm_params.h +++ b/include/sound/pcm_params.h @@ -38,31 +38,6 @@ int snd_pcm_hw_param_value(const struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params, #define MASK_OFS(i) ((i) >> 5) #define MASK_BIT(i) (1U << ((i) & 31))
-static inline unsigned int ld2(u_int32_t v) -{ - unsigned r = 0; - - if (v >= 0x10000) { - v >>= 16; - r += 16; - } - if (v >= 0x100) { - v >>= 8; - r += 8; - } - if (v >= 0x10) { - v >>= 4; - r += 4; - } - if (v >= 4) { - v >>= 2; - r += 2; - } - if (v >= 2) - r++; - return r; -} - static inline size_t snd_mask_sizeof(void) { return sizeof(struct snd_mask); @@ -102,7 +77,7 @@ static inline unsigned int snd_mask_max(const struct snd_mask *mask) int i; for (i = SNDRV_MASK_SIZE - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (mask->bits[i]) - return ld2(mask->bits[i]) + (i << 5); + return __fls(mask->bits[i]) + (i << 5); } return 0; }