22 Dec
2011
22 Dec
'11
8:24 p.m.
On 12/22/2011 08:15 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
OK, sounds good to me. Maybe just make omap4_panda_init_rev() do the cpu_is_omap check for now and then you can patch in the dynamic detection later on?
Yes, this is exactly what will be done for v3.
We can use GPIOs to get the board ID, I'm looking at those for a followup patch. The only issue is that the ID1 GPIO number is different between 4430, and 4460 based Panda. We can have similar revision handling as we have for Beagle at the end.
OK great.
Thanks, Péter