On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:09:21 +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 08:36:42AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 04:36:24 +0200, Hui Peng wrote:
The `uac_mixer_unit_descriptor` shown as below is read from the device side. In `parse_audio_mixer_unit`, `baSourceID` field is accessed from index 0 to `bNrInPins` - 1, the current implementation assumes that descriptor is always valid (the length of descriptor is no shorter than 5 + `bNrInPins`). If a descriptor read from the device side is invalid, it may trigger out-of-bound memory access.
struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor { __u8 bLength; __u8 bDescriptorType; __u8 bDescriptorSubtype; __u8 bUnitID; __u8 bNrInPins; __u8 baSourceID[]; }This patch fixes the bug by add a sanity check on the length of the descriptor.
Signed-off-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com Reported-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com Reported-by: Mathias Payer mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net
sound/usb/mixer.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c index 7498b5191b68..38202ce67237 100644 --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c @@ -2091,6 +2091,15 @@ static int parse_audio_mixer_unit(struct mixer_build *state, int unitid, struct usb_audio_term iterm; int input_pins, num_ins, num_outs; int pin, ich, err;
int desc_len = (int) ((unsigned long) state->buffer +
state->buflen - (unsigned long) raw_desc);if (desc_len < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) {
usb_audio_err(state->chip,"descriptor %d too short\n",unitid);return -EINVAL;}
err = uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(state, desc); if (err < 0) {
Hm, what is the desc->bLength value in the error case?
Basically the buffer boundary is already checked against bLength in snd_usb_find_desc() which is called from obtaining the raw_desc in the caller of this function (parse_audio_unit()).
So, if any, we need to check bLength for the possible overflow like below.
thanks,
Takashi
--- a/sound/usb/mixer.c +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c @@ -744,6 +744,8 @@ static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, return -EINVAL; if (!desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL;
- if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins)
return -EINVAL;VERSION 1 and 2 already have a different check:
if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
So something is possibly off by one. It's just version 3 which doesn't have a check.
No, both are sensible checks. The first check is about the minimal size that doesn't contain bmControls bitmap which is optional on some devices, while the latter checks about the presence of bmControls field. Note that the latter returns zero, which means no error, while the former returns an error.
thanks,
Takashi