It not that nasty considering the two licenses are perfectly compatible. That being said, I'll try and do something about it. Any idea what extra text needs to be added to say this license OR that license.
As mentioned earlier, I basically don't like a dual license because it's ambiguous when a third person adds/modifies the code. I don't think it would be a big issue in the case of small codes like resampler, though.
I'm not sure what you expect here... There's no way I'm going to make my code LGPL-only just so it makes it nicer in ALSA.
Do you already have a patch for inclusion to the alsa-lib tree? If yes, I'd like to merge it before 1.0.14 release very much...
What kind of patch do you mean? I thought it was just a matter of moving the files around from alsa-plugins to alsa-lib. I've also made a couple changes to the code recently, so I'll send you a patch for that as well. Let me know when I need to send them for the 1.0.14 release.
Jean-Marc