![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d930951cb00393ecf9c3db3a56d78fa9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
7 Jul
2023
7 Jul
'23
3:22 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 03:20:10PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
yes, the highest value corresponds to lowest dB which is why its inverted.
Ouch, that's a bad design choice...
It's moderately common - typically in these cases the control is described in the datasheet as an attenuation control rather than a gain, and this usually corresponds to the physical implementation being only able to make signals smaller relative to the reference.