On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 22:19 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 12:12 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
In order to make GPIO ACPI library stricter prepare users of gpiod_get_index() to correctly behave when there no mapping is provided by firmware.
Here we add explicit mapping between _CRS GpioIo() resources and their names used in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
This is a bit more verbose than simply using the same connection name, but I guess will provide better diagnostic to userspace as we will have distinct GPIO names.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Thanks!
But please test it.
I have to check the device node I'm attaching the mapping table to.
On deeper glance it looks now wrong (attaching table to the card platform device when it should be codec's one?).