9 Jan
2012
9 Jan
'12
7:26 a.m.
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:52:17PM -0800, Patrick Lai wrote:
so it looks like what really ought to happen here is that the existing macro gets renamed to the new macro and a new macro gets defined for double values if one is needed.
Is there backward compatibility concern? I see soc/codec/uda1380.c already using SOC_DOUBLE_S8_TLV.
Obviously all existing users would need to be updated. Out of tree users will fail to compile which is fine, it's not going to fail mysteriously at runtime or anything.