On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:36:06 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
One more comment...
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 16:20 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 22:44 +0530, karina filer wrote:
Hi Team,
Greetings !!
I am facing difficulty to understand the Alsa-Plugin Licensing, Could you please help me to make understand?, Is it under GPL 2.0 or LGPL 2.1 because after extracting the folder I can see 2 copying file one for GPL and other for LGPL.
alsa-plugins seems to lack a README or other overview document about the licensing... alsa-plugins is primarily licensed under LGPL 2.1, and to my knowledge the only exception is the libsamplerate based rate plugin. The licensing is explained here:
https://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-plugins.git;a=blob;f=rate/rate_samplera...
So this particluar rate plugin is licensed under GPL 2.0 "to follow the license of libsamplerate", unless you have a commercial license to libsamplerate. I don't think the rationale for that exception makes much sense (LGPL would have worked just fine, as far as I can tell), but at this point relicensing may be very difficult due to many contributors.
Relicensing shouldn't be that hard after all, if that's desired (I think it would be a good idea). Now that I looked, there actually aren't many contributors to that plugin, only Takashi and Jaroslav. Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò also has a commit, but it only changes one line in the build system.
I don't mind relicensing at all. But the only concern is that no one but for lawyers can confirm its validity...
thanks,
Takashi