20 Sep
2012
20 Sep
'12
2:49 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:03:34AM +0200, Ola Lilja wrote:
I still don't like this. It is the dai_link-struct that bothers me. We have "ux500-msp-i2s.1" as name of the platform AND the cpu_dai. The MSP I2S-block is not the platform and it is certainly not both platform and cpu-DAI at the same time.
Mark: Did you have a solution for this? Couldn't we just put NULL on the platform_name instead?
No, having no platform driver means a direct device<->device link (like baseband<->CODEC). You could always register the platform with a -dma added in the name or something, it'd be a bit more code but it'd work, but the framework doesn't particularly care what you call these things.