
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 08:17:33PM +0800, Baojun Xu wrote:
TIAS2781 is unofficial hardware id in acpi for tas2781 in HDA,
ACPI
has been used for several projects. TXNW is the official hardware id for TI, will be used in new projects, including device on SPI bus. This patch will support both TIAS2781 and TXNW2781 in acpi
ACPI
with tas2781 under HDA.
...
- hda_priv->save_calibration = tas2781_save_calibration;
- tas_hda->priv->global_addr = TAS2781_GLOBAL_ADDR;
No, just add these lines to a new branch.
if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), "TIAS2781")) { device_name = "TIAS2781";
hda_priv->save_calibration = tas2781_save_calibration;
tas_hda->priv->global_addr = TAS2781_GLOBAL_ADDR;
- } else if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), "TXNW2781:00-tas2781-hda.0")) {
Why do you need to match the full device instance name? Moreover, strstr() is incorrect. Should be strstarts() or str_has_prefix().
} else if (strstr(dev_name(&clt->dev), "INT8866")) { device_name = "INT8866"; hda_priv->save_calibration = tas2563_save_calibration; tas_hda->priv->global_addr = TAS2563_GLOBAL_ADDR;device_name = "TXNW2781";
- } else
- } else { return -ENODEV;
- }
Unrelated change.
...
static const struct acpi_device_id tas2781_acpi_hda_match[] = { {"TIAS2781", 0 },
- {"TXNW2781", 0 }, {"INT8866", 0 },
Keep them sorted, please. Perhaps an additional patch?
{} };