On 12/7/17 6:27 AM, Ughreja, Rakesh A wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Koul, Vinod Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 9:48 PM To: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Cc: Ughreja, Rakesh A rakesh.a.ughreja@intel.com; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; broonie@kernel.org; tiwai@suse.de; liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com; Patches Audio patches.audio@intel.com Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC 01/10] ASoC: Intel: Boards: Machine driver for Intel platforms
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:37:37AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 12/4/17 9:10 AM, Ughreja, Rakesh A wrote:
>> sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig | 10 ++ >> sound/soc/intel/boards/Makefile | 2 + >> sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_hda_generic.c | 276 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > can we drop the Skylake reference? It's become a catch-all term to mean > both the platform, the IP and the driver.
Suggest some name. I have no problem.
HiFi3 ? iDisp ? HDAudio-DSP ?
hda_dsp_generic.c -- For the main file hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions
Does it look fine ?
works for me.
Sorry not for me. hda_dsp_xxx doesnt tie it to anything. HDA and DSP are too generic terms. But yes I don't have a better alternate than skl_generic. Here this solution is tied to a very specfic IP which is present in SKL onwards platforms..
Yes SKL is become an IP as well as platform. Maybe we should have a codename for this like azx :)
We do have a code name "sst".
So does this sound okay for you ?
sst_hda_dsp_generic.c -- For main file sst_hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions
SST is also aliased to platform drivers with closed-source firmware, not a good idea for machine drivers.