The Subject was "Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: care missing address #address-cells"
Hi Rob
I'm trying to create v2 of simple-card patch, And got issue which I can't solve by myself.
I think "xxx,yyy" (= which has "," at the property name) needs special care, but it is very un-understandable... Now, I'm give up. So, can I ask you 2 things about Yaml Doc "xxx,yyy" type property ?
======================== 1) reference own definitions from "xxx,yyy" ========================
I guess "xxx,yyy" naming property needs to has "description", right ?
But, it is OK if it references "/schemas/xxxx"
--- OK ------ xxx,yyy: description: xxx $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array -------------
but, will be error if it references own definitions
--- NG ------ xxx,yyy: description: xxx $ref: "#/definitions/mydef" -------------
This is the related error
-- error(?) -- xxx.yaml: properties:xxx,yyy:\ $ref: '#/definitions/mydef' does not match 'types.yaml#[/]{0,1}definitions/.*' --------------
# but, there is no problem if it was defined as "patternProperties"
Q. The "xxx,yyy" property can't references own definitions, or needs some magical extra settings ??
======================== 2) phandle for "xxx,yyy" ========================
I noticed that it seems "xxx,yyy" property can't be referenced. Here, "xxx,yyy" has "type: object" and "additionalProperties: false" (below didn't happen if it doesn't have "additionalProperties: false")
If "xxx,yyy" has phandle, but not referenced, This is not a problem.
--- OK --- ... foo = <&bar>; ... xxx_yyy: xxx,yyy { ... }; --------------
But will be error if it is referenced.
--- NG --- foo = <&xxx_yyy>; ... xxx_yyy: xxx,yyy { ... }; ------------
The error is
-- error --- xxx.yaml: xxx.yyy: \ Additional properties are not allowed ('phandle' was unexpected) ------------
Q. The "xxx,yyy" needs magical settings to be referenced, or can't be ?