On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:34:57AM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote:
Hi Nicolin,
On Ma, 2019-04-09 at 21:29 -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:27:39AM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote:
Use "of_device_id.data" to specify the machine driver instead of "model" DTS attribute.
Signed-off-by: Viorel Suman viorel.suman@nxp.com
Acked-by: Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_audmix.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
+ priv->pdev = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev, mdrv, 0, NULL, + 0);
Would you please send a separate patch to replace "pdev->dev"?
Thank you for review. Yes, will send V3.
Ah...when I said that, I was literally saying that you should send a separate patch individually, not resend the series.
Now I see you sent v3/v4 almost at the same time as "Applied" mails from Mark. And I am totally confused which version got applied....
Please rebase your local tree and find out which version got applied and then send the diff with a separate patch.
Thanks Nicolin