30 Oct
2014
30 Oct
'14
3:13 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mchehab@osg.samsung.com wrote:
Yeah, if nobody is using such devices, then we should get rid of them, but I prefer to have this on a separate patch, in order to give people the opportunity to complain.
Yes, I would definitely suggest a separate patch. There's no reason it should be mixed in with your general cleanup of the ALSA quirks.
So, if I'm understanding well, you're suggesting to add a patch removing those 5 entries (and the corresponding quirks on alsa), right?
{ USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7201), .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_HVR950Q_MXL }, { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7211), .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_HVR950Q_MXL }, { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7281), .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_HVR950Q_MXL }, { USB_DEVICE(0x05e1, 0x0480), .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_WOODBURY }, { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x8200), .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_WOODBURY }, { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7260),
Exactly.
Devin
--
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com