26 Jul
2013
26 Jul
'13
8:19 a.m.
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:23:56 +0100 Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:38:55AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
There's a much better solution to this, which is to get rid of kirkwood_dma_priv entirely:
This does seem a lot nicer, can we either grab the relevant patch from your tree or update this one to use the same approach?
Russel's solution works fine for me, so my patch 1/4 may be cancelled.
--
Ken ar c'hentaƱ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/