 
            
            
            
            
                26 Jul
                
                    2013
                
            
            
                26 Jul
                
                '13
                
            
            
            
        
    
                8:19 a.m.
            
        On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:23:56 +0100 Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:38:55AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
There's a much better solution to this, which is to get rid of kirkwood_dma_priv entirely:
This does seem a lot nicer, can we either grab the relevant patch from your tree or update this one to use the same approach?
Russel's solution works fine for me, so my patch 1/4 may be cancelled.
-- 
Ken ar c'hentaƱ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/