4 Jun
2010
4 Jun
'10
1:59 a.m.
On 4 Jun 2010, at 00:57, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
Mark Brown wrote: Uhm, actually this code path is taken when switching from _OFF to another state. If it is guaranteed that _OFF is always followed by a certain other state I could put the reset code in its part of the switch statement.
The only possible transitions are OFF <-> STANDBY <-> PREPARE <-> ON