Our code analyzer reported a uaf.
In snd_emu8000_create_mixer, the callee snd_ctl_add(..,emu->controls[i]) calls snd_ctl_add_replace(.., kcontrol,..). Inside snd_ctl_add_replace(), if error happens, kcontrol will be freed by snd_ctl_free_one(kcontrol). Then emu->controls[i] points to a freed memory, and the execution comes to __error branch of snd_emu8000_create_mixer. The freed emu->controls[i] is used in snd_ctl_remove(card, emu->controls[i]).
My patch set emu->controls[i] to NULL if snd_ctl_add() failed to avoid the uaf.
Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong lyl2019@mail.ustc.edu.cn --- sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c index 0aa545ac6e60..1c90421a88dc 100644 --- a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c +++ b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c @@ -1029,8 +1029,10 @@ snd_emu8000_create_mixer(struct snd_card *card, struct snd_emu8000 *emu)
memset(emu->controls, 0, sizeof(emu->controls)); for (i = 0; i < EMU8000_NUM_CONTROLS; i++) { - if ((err = snd_ctl_add(card, emu->controls[i] = snd_ctl_new1(mixer_defs[i], emu))) < 0) + if ((err = snd_ctl_add(card, emu->controls[i] = snd_ctl_new1(mixer_defs[i], emu))) < 0) { + emu->controls[i] = NULL; goto __error; + } } return 0;