On 27/04/2022 13:36, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
On (22/04/27 11:50), Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
@@ -784,16 +785,23 @@ static int sof_get_control_data(struct snd_soc_component *scomp, }
cdata = wdata[i].control->ipc_control_data;
wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data;
if (!wdata[i].pdata)
return -EINVAL;
/* make sure data is valid - data can be updated at runtime */
if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES &&
wdata[i].pdata->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
return -EINVAL;
if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES) {
if (!cdata->data)
return -EINVAL;
if (cdata->data->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
return -EINVAL;
wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data->data;
wdata[i].pdata_size = cdata->data->size;
} else {
wdata[i].pdata = cdata->chanv; /* points to the control data union */
wdata[i].pdata_size = wdata[i].control->size;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A question, so here wdata[i].control->size is
scontrol->size = struct_size(scontrol->control_data, chanv, le32_to_cpu(mc->num_channels));
Right?
If so, then is this really what we memcpy()? We memcpy() control->data->chanv and its size is `sizeof(chanv) * le32_to_cpu(mc->num_channels)`, isn't it?
[..]
if (ipc_data_size) { for (i = 0; i < widget->num_kcontrols; i++) {
if (!wdata[i].pdata_size)
continue;
memcpy(&process->data[offset], wdata[i].pdata,
wdata[i].pdata_size);
} }offset += wdata[i].pdata_size;
So should sof_get_control_data() have instead of this
wdata[i].pdata_size = wdata[i].control->size;
something like this
wdata[i].pdata_size = wdata[i].control->size - sizeof(struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data);
Yes, you are right.
So that we will copy payload data, which is a bunch of chanv structs 8 bytes each.