13 Mar
2013
13 Mar
'13
11:49 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:18:29AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
I did not see any objection from you on that patch, so I'm waiting for you to publish a branch for it, so that my mxs-dma generic binding series can move forward.
I commented on the removal of the const from the name parameter (and ideally an in order version of the patch series would be nice) but in general I was mostly waiting for review and test from other people. DT and dmaengine both seem endless sources of problems so I'd rather make sure everyone's had a chance to look.