7 Aug
2020
7 Aug
'20
11:01 a.m.
When snd_usb_mixer_add_control() fails, elem needs to be freed just like when snd_ctl_new1() fails. However, current code is returning directly and ends up leaking memory.
Can an imperative wording be preferred for the change description?
…
+++ b/sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c @@ -964,8 +964,10 @@ static int scarlett2_add_new_ctl(struct usb_mixer_interface *mixer, strlcpy(kctl->id.name, name, sizeof(kctl->id.name));
err = snd_usb_mixer_add_control(&elem->head, kctl);
- if (err < 0)
- if (err < 0) {
return err;kfree(elem);
- }
…
I propose to add a jump target so that a bit of common exception handling code can be better reused in this function implementation.
Regards, Markus