4 Nov
2015
4 Nov
'15
3:29 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:27:08PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:24:58AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between this and what's going on in sst-acpi. They seem to be doing the same thing in slightly different ways, they both match tables of CODEC IDs to machine driver names with the distinction being that this doesn't provide a firmware filename whereas sst-acpi does but the mechanics of mapping a CODEC to a machine driver seem otherwise the same.
I don't disagree with your observation, the code does same stuff and only difference is the data we require here, so commonizing becomes tricky
The only difference in data appears to be a firmware file name?