19 Sep
2014
19 Sep
'14
9:51 a.m.
On 09/18/2014 08:54 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:48:44PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
for-next, I don't think this is critical enough for stable.
@@ -2413,6 +2413,7 @@ static int max98090_remove(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) { struct max98090_priv *max98090 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- devm_free_irq(codec->dev, max98090->irq, codec);
If this is a fix for -next shouldn't we be doing the proper fix and moving the resource acquisition to the bus probe?
Fair enough. I'll cook another version.
--
Jarkko