On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:52:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:18:18PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 07:00:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:45:30PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
This is an RFC patch, as it says in the Subject line, and the cover note. It is not intended to be applied yet. Please unapply it, and the other one in the series you have applied.
Eh? I thought the discussion was that everything was OK and we were going to go ahead with this approach. Or to put it another way what's wrong with this and what's expected to change?
What is wrong is that the merge path for the first patch, which removes the boards making use of these drivers, has already closed for patches. So we now have boards left in the tree with broken audio. We can leave it that way, because these boards are actually in the tree twice. One using DT, which will work as things are now, and old style board file boards which are broken.
OK, so another part of this is that you didn't send the first patch to me so I didn't realise that the boards were still there. TBH I'd have expected that removal to just be going in independently of cleaning up the drivers.
Anyway, I dropped the patches.
Thanks Mark, sorry for the confusion.
thx,
Jason.