On 30/3/20 9:32 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:58:31PM +1100, Matt Flax wrote:
This patch is aims to start a stronger discussion on allowing both CPU and Codec dais to set formats independently based on direction.
If the DAIs support completely separate formats they're not a single DAI and should be represented as two DAIs.
I understand, however having two DAIs produces subdevices and pushes the overhead of managing registers to the end user in the form of two sub devices.
Is everyone firm on the concept that a DAI's playback and capture stream has to have the same format in the same DAI ?
I can see a much better solution (then the one I posted here) which is also very simple to solve this problem in the same DAI.
One example of a sound card which requires independent stream formats is an isolated sound card, such as the Audio Injector Isolated sound card. The magnetic isolation chips on the sound card require stream fomats to be different because of digital latency variations on the I2S lines.
Honestly I'm not convinced this is ever going to work reliably - there is in general an assumption in the code that the formats on both ends of the link are the same, it seems you'll have to break that as well as having an asymmetric configuration. You probably need to represent these isolators as a CODEC and do a CODEC to CODEC link and even then it seems worrying.
I like to think of isolation as innovative, not worrying :)
However w.r.t. the codec to codec link approach, I will take your advice and not go down that route.
thanks
Matt