On 07/03/2024 08:44, Chancel Liu wrote:
Platform device for card to probe is registered in imx-audio-rpmsg. According to this change DT node of ASoC CPU DAI device is updated.
Signed-off-by: Chancel Liu chancel.liu@nxp.com
sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c index e5bd63dab10c..2686125b3043 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c @@ -108,10 +108,9 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_late_probe(struct
snd_soc_card *card)
static int imx_rpmsg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *dlc;
struct device *dev = pdev->dev.parent; /* rpmsg_pdev is the platform device for the rpmsg node that probedus */
struct platform_device *rpmsg_pdev = to_platform_device(dev);struct device_node *np = rpmsg_pdev->dev.of_node;
struct platform_device *rpmsg_pdev = NULL;struct device_node *np = NULL; struct of_phandle_args args; const char *platform_name; struct imx_rpmsg *data;@@ -127,6 +126,22 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
goto fail; }
if (!strcmp(pdev->dev.platform_data, "rpmsg-micfil-channel"))np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "rpmsg_micfil");elsenp = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "rpmsg_audio");Why do you create ABI on node names? Where is it documented? Why can't you use phandles?
Best regards, Krzysztof
Thanks for your reminder. Truly I shouldn't use undocumented bindings. I will use “fsl,rpmsg-channel-name” to refine patch set. Please help review next version.
Regards, Chancel Liu