At Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:35:50 +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Dan Carpenter wrote:
Smatch complains that "control" is user specifigy and needs to be capped. The call tree to understand this warning is quite long.
snd_seq_write() <-- get the event from the user snd_seq_client_enqueue_event() snd_seq_deliver_event() deliver_to_subscribers() snd_seq_deliver_single_event() snd_opl3_oss_event_input() snd_midi_process_event() do_control()
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com
I have spent some time reviewing this code, but I may have missed something where we verify that control is in bounds. I'm not very familiar with this code and the call tree is fairly long.
BTW, there are other ways to deliver events. In any case, events are pretty much opaque blobs, and most fields are not checked.
Right.
diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_midi_emul.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_midi_emul.c index 9b6470c..7ba9373 100644 --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_midi_emul.c +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_midi_emul.c @@ -269,6 +269,9 @@ do_control(struct snd_midi_op *ops, void *drv, struct snd_midi_channel_set *chse { int i;
- if (control >= ARRAY_SIZE(chan->control))
return;Is this correct for an unsigned int converted to an int?
That should be OK. ARRAY_SIZE() is size_t (i.e. unsigned long), so the comparison is done in unsigned. When control is negative, it's beyond ARRAY_SIZE() and handled as an error here, too.
Takashi