This reverts commit 957ce0c6b8a1f26559864507ae0bfcba29d924ad.
That commit cause soc_pcm_params_symmetry can't take effect. cpu_dai->rate, cpu_dai->channels and cpu_dai->sample_bits are updated in the middle of soc_pcm_hw_params, so move soc_pcm_params_symmetry to the end of soc_pcm_hw_params is not a good solution, for judgement of symmetry in the function is always true.
FIXME: According to the comments of that commit, I think the case described in the commit should disable symmetric_rates in Back-End, rather than changing the position of soc_pcm_params_symmetry.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 8655df6a6089..b7800c95327a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -861,6 +861,11 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int i, ret = 0;
mutex_lock_nested(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex, rtd->card->pcm_subclass); + + ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params); + if (ret) + goto out; + if (rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params) { ret = rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params(substream, params); if (ret < 0) { @@ -940,9 +945,6 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, } component = NULL;
- ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params); - if (ret) - goto component_err; out: mutex_unlock(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex); return ret;