19 Jan
2012
19 Jan
'12
9:27 a.m.
On 01/18/2012 06:46 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
That'd help a bit. Though I'd just go with a for loop, the while clearly doesn't look any better - I was just suggesting it without actually having tried writing it out.
Are you going to take the for version of patch, or should I resend it? I can add a comment to explain that we bail out, and not checking the sample sizes lower than the requested msbits, if it helps.
--
Péter