At Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:24:18 +0000, Clive Messer wrote:
On Wednesday 25 Feb 2009 15:51:33 you wrote:
At Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:11:44 +0000,
Clive Messer wrote:
36192 36191 100068 3 0 0 1 2 36195 36194 100090 2 0 0 1 2 36198 36198 100113 1 0 0 1 2 36207 36206 63854 2816 1600 0 1 3 36212 36211 63854 2815 1601 4 1 3 36216 36216 63854 2814 1602 4 1 3 36221 36220 63854 2813 1603 4 1 3 36225 36225 101224 4460 -44 4 1 3
This is pretty weird. Is this behavior always reproducible?
Nope. I get different results every time I run it.
What shows with the patch below to alsa-lib?
Here's one (attached) I just did with the new patch that shows the crazy high numbers again. hwsync: 2080(0), 6496(0) 70758 70758 47142 0 4416 0 0 3 hwsync: 1472(0), 6496(0) 70763 70762 104573379136040 4971973988617026976 -4971973988617022560 4 1 3
The problem is that hwptr goes backward here. But it didn't happen in this hwsync call but sometime before that.
Could you try the patch below instead? This will track all sync_ptr calls.
Takashi
--- diff --git a/src/pcm/pcm_hw.c b/src/pcm/pcm_hw.c index e9ce092..ad8d4a5 100644 --- a/src/pcm/pcm_hw.c +++ b/src/pcm/pcm_hw.c @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ struct timespec snd_pcm_hw_fast_tstamp(snd_pcm_t *pcm) static int sync_ptr1(snd_pcm_hw_t *hw, unsigned int flags) { int err; + long old_hwptr, new_hwptr; + long old_applptr, new_applptr; + old_hwptr = *pcm->hw.ptr; + old_applptr = *pcm->appl.ptr; hw->sync_ptr->flags = flags; err = ioctl((hw)->fd, SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, (hw)->sync_ptr); if (err < 0) { @@ -138,6 +142,11 @@ static int sync_ptr1(snd_pcm_hw_t *hw, unsigned int flags) SYSMSG("SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR failed"); return err; } + new_hwptr = *pcm->hw.ptr; + new_applptr = *pcm->appl.ptr; + printf("sync_ptr1: %ld(%ld), %ld(%ld)\n", + new_hwptr, new_hwptr - old_hwptr, + new_applptr, new_applptr - old_applptr); return 0; }