On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:09:42PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
On 7/11/2023 4:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:57:20PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
...
.device = 0x119a,
.device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ADSP_TNG,Yeah, somebody familiar with Intel history of SST/HDA/wtf should really tell why HDA code is using this ID. Does it mean that SST implies HDA always? Only for this (or this family of) platform?
It might affect the ID naming, but otherwise it's orthogonal to the series.
There were few early devices where DSP was separate unit: Haswell, Broadwell - where we use ACPI to load (SND_SOC_INTEL_CATPT) audio driver, Tangier/Merrifield - where ACPI or PCI is used to load (SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_PCI) audio driver. All further generations are HDA devices with integrated DSP. This causes all the weirdness ;)
Maybe we should stick with SST in the name? At least that's how Tangier TRM titles it.