On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 09:53:50AM +0100, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:53:17PM +0700, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:29:00AM +0100, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
I don't actually know if MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE can reference an object in a different file off the top of my head, though a brief test suggests it has issues.
Does this approch can work?
I'd suggest testing...
It would be more data driven to just register a different DAI structure for the 1795. Both approaches work, it's just a little nicer to avoid code where possible.
Yes I know but my idea was exactly to not create special DAI because technically they are the same code with diffferent constraints. This even give an other example of the usage of the API.
They would still share all the same code, it's just moving the decision to probe time given that this is a trivial constraint change and the constraints are listed in the data structure.